 | #363 VMI |
| Lexington, VA - Southern |
2025-2026 Schedule
Note: Game results highlighted in green indicate that the team exceeded expectations, even if it was a loss. Games highlighted in red indicate that the team failed to meet expectations, even if it was a win.
| Date | Opponent | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ |  | Southern Indiana | W 78 - 74 |
| Nov 9 | @ |  | Missouri | L 106 - 68 |
| Nov 15 | vs |  | Jacksonville | L 69 - 67 |
| Nov 19 | @ |  | Richmond | L 87 - 54 |
| Nov 22 | @ |  | Stetson | L 99 - 80 |
| Nov 24 | (N) |  | Buffalo | L 78 - 70 |
| Nov 26 | (N) |  | Bowling Green | L 81 - 48 |
| Nov 29 | @ |  | Central Florida | L 82 - 57 |
| Dec 9 | vs |  | Loyola Maryland | W 86 - 70 |
| Dec 21 | @ |  | Radford | L 97 - 90 |
| Jan 1 | vs |  | Samford | L 78 - 58 |
| Jan 3 | vs |  | Chattanooga | W 79 - 71 |
| Jan 7 | @ |  | East Tennessee St | L 81 - 67 |
| Jan 10 | @ |  | Furman | L 69 - 48 |
| Jan 15 | vs |  | Mercer | L 77 - 67 |
| Jan 17 | vs |  | Citadel | L 82 - 68 |
| Jan 21 | vs |  | North Carolina Greensboro | L 85 - 78 |
| Jan 24 | @ |  | Western Carolina | L 88 - 58 |
| Jan 29 | @ | | Citadel | L 80 - 56 |
| Jan 31 | @ | | Mercer | L 95 - 81 |
| Feb 4 | vs |  | Wofford | L 81 - 67 |
| Feb 7 | vs | | East Tennessee St | L 87 - 70 |
| Feb 11 | @ | | North Carolina Greensboro | L 92 - 71 |
| Feb 14 | vs | | Furman | L 90 - 72 |
| Feb 18 | @ | | Wofford | L 82 - 76 |
| Feb 21 | vs | | Western Carolina | L 81 - 62 |
| Feb 26 | @ | | Samford | L 80 - 61 |
| Feb 28 | @ | | Chattanooga | L 86 - 79 |
| Mar 6 | (N) | | North Carolina Greensboro | L 84 - 70 |
Stats
| Overall | ||
|---|---|---|
| Record | 3-26 | |
| vs Conference | 1-18 | |
| vs Top 50 | 0-0 | |
| Adj. Predicted Win % | 0.066 [363] | |
| Adj. Efficiency Δ | -26.9 [361] | |
| Strength of schedule | 291st | |
| Adj. Pace | 67.1 [240] | |
| Avg. Margin | -14.7 [358] | |
| Consistency | 73rd | |
| 3-point % | 31.5 [306] | |
| 3-point Ratio | 53.6 [2] | |
| Free Throw % | 72.2 [200] | |
| Offense | Defense | |
| Adjusted Efficiency | 98 [332] | 124.9 [365] |
| Adjusted Four Factors - Offense | ||
| Value | Correlation | |
| Effective FG% | 46.1 [339] | 0.85 [105] |
| Offensive Turnover % | 15.6 [124] | -0.65 [12] |
| Offensive Rebound % | 25 [325] | 0.17 [293] |
| Free Throw Rate | 28 [337] | -0.04 [320] |
| Adjusted Four Factors - Defense | ||
| Value | Correlation | |
| Opponent Effective FG% | 57.8 [356] | 0.67 [347] |
| Defensive Turnover % | 14.9 [278] | -0.49 [107] |
| Defensive Rebound % | 61.2 [363] | -0.22 [270] |
| Opponent Free Throw Rate | 32.4 [123] | -0.19 [154] |
Note: Kalman filter settling time is responsible for some of the early season variance.