 | #151 Rutgers |
| Piscataway, NJ - Big Ten |
2025-2026 Schedule
Note: Game results highlighted in green indicate that the team exceeded expectations, even if it was a loss. Games highlighted in red indicate that the team failed to meet expectations, even if it was a win.
| Date | Opponent | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs |  | Rider | W 81 - 53 |
| Nov 10 | vs |  | Maine | W 72 - 60 |
| Nov 14 | vs |  | Lehigh | W 84 - 72 |
| Nov 18 | vs |  | American University | W 80 - 71 |
| Nov 21 | vs |  | Central Connecticut | L 67 - 54 |
| Nov 24 | (N) |  | #20 Tennessee | L 85 - 60 |
| Nov 25 | (N) |  | Notre Dame | L 68 - 63 |
| Nov 27 | (N) |  | UNLV | W 80 - 65 |
| Dec 2 | vs |  | #7 Purdue | L 81 - 65 |
| Dec 6 | @ |  | #2 Michigan | L 101 - 60 |
| Dec 13 | @ |  | Seton Hall | L 81 - 59 |
| Dec 20 | vs |  | Pennsylvania | W 70 - 69 |
| Dec 29 | vs |  | Delaware St | W 65 - 50 |
| Jan 2 | vs |  | #23 Ohio St | L 80 - 73 |
| Jan 5 | vs |  | Oregon | W 88 - 85 (OT) |
| Jan 8 | @ |  | #8 Illinois | L 81 - 55 |
| Jan 11 | vs |  | Northwestern | W 77 - 75 (OT) |
| Jan 17 | @ |  | #25 Wisconsin | L 96 - 87 |
| Jan 20 | @ |  | Iowa | L 68 - 62 |
| Jan 23 | vs |  | Indiana | L 82 - 59 |
| Jan 27 | vs |  | #9 Michigan St | L 88 - 79 (OT) |
| Jan 31 | @ |  | Southern California | L 78 - 75 |
| Feb 3 | @ |  | UCLA | L 98 - 66 |
| Feb 7 | vs |  | #14 Nebraska | L 80 - 68 |
| Feb 15 | vs |  | Maryland | W 68 - 57 |
| Feb 18 | @ |  | Penn St | W 85 - 72 |
| Feb 21 | @ |  | Minnesota | L 80 - 61 |
| Feb 24 | vs |  | Washington | L 79 - 72 |
| Mar 1 | @ | | Maryland | W 69 - 65 |
| Mar 5 | @ | | #9 Michigan St | L 91 - 87 |
| Mar 8 | vs | | Penn St | W 74 - 62 |
| Mar 11 | (N) | | Minnesota | W 72 - 67 |
| Mar 12 | (N) | | UCLA | L 72 - 59 |
| Apr 2 | (N) |  | Creighton | L 82 - 69 |
Stats
| Overall | ||
|---|---|---|
| Record | 14-20 | |
| vs Conference | 7-15 | |
| vs Top 50 | 0-13 | |
| Adj. Predicted Win % | 0.538 [151] | |
| Adj. Efficiency Δ | 2.2 [148] | |
| Strength of schedule | 76th | |
| Adj. Pace | 68.6 [153] | |
| Avg. Margin | -4.8 [274] | |
| Consistency | 284th | |
| 3-point % | 32.4 [261] | |
| 3-point Ratio | 34.4 [286] | |
| Free Throw % | 74.1 [126] | |
| Offense | Defense | |
| Adjusted Efficiency | 108.6 [166] | 106.4 [146] |
| Adjusted Four Factors - Offense | ||
| Value | Correlation | |
| Effective FG% | 49 [272] | 0.7 [339] |
| Offensive Turnover % | 13.9 [37] | -0.37 [195] |
| Offensive Rebound % | 29.9 [192] | 0.24 [256] |
| Free Throw Rate | 42.5 [29] | 0.36 [54] |
| Adjusted Four Factors - Defense | ||
| Value | Correlation | |
| Opponent Effective FG% | 51.3 [176] | 0.82 [165] |
| Defensive Turnover % | 18.5 [61] | -0.38 [213] |
| Defensive Rebound % | 69.3 [219] | -0.35 [146] |
| Opponent Free Throw Rate | 31.5 [102] | -0.03 [328] |
Note: Kalman filter settling time is responsible for some of the early season variance.