 | #7 Purdue |
| West Lafayette, IN - Big Ten |
2025-2026 Schedule
Note: Game results highlighted in green indicate that the team exceeded expectations, even if it was a loss. Games highlighted in red indicate that the team failed to meet expectations, even if it was a win.
| Date | Opponent | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs |  | Evansville | W 82 - 51 |
| Nov 7 | vs |  | Oakland | W 87 - 77 |
| Nov 13 | @ |  | #10 Alabama | W 87 - 80 |
| Nov 16 | vs |  | Akron | W 97 - 79 |
| Nov 20 | (N) |  | Memphis | W 80 - 71 |
| Nov 21 | (N) |  | #16 Texas Tech | W 86 - 56 |
| Nov 28 | vs |  | Eastern Illinois | W 109 - 62 |
| Dec 2 | @ |  | Rutgers | W 81 - 65 |
| Dec 6 | vs |  | #11 Iowa St | L 81 - 58 |
| Dec 10 | vs |  | Minnesota | W 85 - 57 |
| Dec 13 | vs |  | Marquette | W 79 - 59 |
| Dec 20 | (N) |  | Auburn | W 88 - 60 |
| Dec 29 | vs |  | Kent St | W 101 - 60 |
| Jan 3 | @ |  | #25 Wisconsin | W 89 - 73 |
| Jan 7 | vs |  | Washington | W 81 - 73 |
| Jan 10 | vs |  | Penn St | W 93 - 85 |
| Jan 14 | vs |  | Iowa | W 79 - 72 |
| Jan 17 | @ |  | Southern California | W 69 - 64 |
| Jan 20 | @ |  | UCLA | L 69 - 67 |
| Jan 24 | vs |  | #8 Illinois | L 88 - 82 |
| Jan 27 | @ |  | Indiana | L 72 - 67 |
| Feb 1 | @ |  | Maryland | W 93 - 63 |
| Feb 7 | vs |  | Oregon | W 68 - 64 |
| Feb 10 | @ |  | #14 Nebraska | W 80 - 77 (OT) |
| Feb 14 | @ | | Iowa | W 78 - 57 |
| Feb 17 | vs |  | #2 Michigan | L 91 - 80 |
| Feb 20 | vs | | Indiana | W 93 - 64 |
| Feb 26 | vs |  | #9 Michigan St | L 76 - 74 |
| Mar 1 | @ |  | #23 Ohio St | L 82 - 74 |
| Mar 4 | @ |  | Northwestern | W 70 - 66 |
| Mar 7 | vs | | #25 Wisconsin | L 97 - 93 |
| Mar 12 | (N) | | Northwestern | W 81 - 68 |
| Mar 13 | (N) | | #14 Nebraska | W 74 - 58 |
| Mar 14 | (N) | | UCLA | W 73 - 66 |
| Mar 15 | (N) | | #2 Michigan | W 80 - 72 |
| Mar 20 | (N) |  | Queens University | W 104 - 71 |
| Mar 22 | (N) |  | Miami | W 79 - 69 |
| Mar 26 | (N) |  | Texas | W 79 - 77 |
| Mar 28 | (N) |  | #1 Arizona | L 79 - 64 |
Stats
| Overall | ||
|---|---|---|
| Record | 30-9 | |
| vs Conference | 17-7 | |
| vs Top 50 | 12-8 | |
| Adj. Predicted Win % | 0.925 [7] | |
| Adj. Efficiency Δ | 33 [8] | |
| Strength of schedule | 5th | |
| Adj. Pace | 63.9 [352] | |
| Avg. Margin | 11.1 [17] | |
| Consistency | 283rd | |
| 3-point % | 38.3 [12] | |
| 3-point Ratio | 40.1 [171] | |
| Free Throw % | 74.6 [101] | |
| Offense | Defense | |
| Adjusted Efficiency | 133.3 [1] | 100.3 [49] |
| Adjusted Four Factors - Offense | ||
| Value | Correlation | |
| Effective FG% | 60.8 [4] | 0.83 [169] |
| Offensive Turnover % | 12.9 [18] | -0.32 [236] |
| Offensive Rebound % | 40.2 [6] | 0.3 [202] |
| Free Throw Rate | 30 [309] | 0.05 [308] |
| Adjusted Four Factors - Defense | ||
| Value | Correlation | |
| Opponent Effective FG% | 49.7 [111] | 0.86 [86] |
| Defensive Turnover % | 16.2 [182] | -0.38 [218] |
| Defensive Rebound % | 74.8 [21] | -0.35 [147] |
| Opponent Free Throw Rate | 23.7 [6] | 0.29 [98] |
Note: Kalman filter settling time is responsible for some of the early season variance.