 | #10 Alabama |
| Tuscaloosa, AL - SEC |
2025-2026 Schedule
Note: Game results highlighted in green indicate that the team exceeded expectations, even if it was a loss. Games highlighted in red indicate that the team failed to meet expectations, even if it was a win.
| Date | Opponent | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs |  | North Dakota | W 91 - 62 |
| Nov 8 | @ |  | #12 St. John's | W 103 - 96 |
| Nov 13 | vs |  | #7 Purdue | L 87 - 80 |
| Nov 19 | (N) |  | #8 Illinois | W 90 - 86 |
| Nov 24 | (N) |  | #22 Gonzaga | L 95 - 85 |
| Nov 25 | (N) |  | UNLV | W 115 - 76 |
| Nov 26 | (N) |  | Maryland | W 105 - 72 |
| Dec 3 | vs |  | Clemson | W 90 - 84 |
| Dec 7 | vs |  | Texas San Antonio | W 97 - 55 |
| Dec 13 | (N) |  | #1 Arizona | L 96 - 75 |
| Dec 17 | vs |  | South Florida | W 104 - 93 |
| Dec 21 | (N) |  | Kennesaw St | W 92 - 81 |
| Dec 29 | vs |  | Yale | W 102 - 78 |
| Jan 3 | vs |  | Kentucky | W 89 - 74 |
| Jan 7 | @ |  | #15 Vanderbilt | L 96 - 90 |
| Jan 10 | vs |  | Texas | L 92 - 88 |
| Jan 13 | @ |  | Mississippi St | W 97 - 82 |
| Jan 17 | @ |  | Oklahoma | W 83 - 81 |
| Jan 24 | vs |  | #20 Tennessee | L 79 - 73 |
| Jan 27 | vs |  | Missouri | W 90 - 64 |
| Feb 1 | @ |  | #6 Florida | L 100 - 77 |
| Feb 4 | vs |  | Texas A&M | W 100 - 97 |
| Feb 7 | @ |  | Auburn | W 96 - 92 |
| Feb 11 | @ |  | Mississippi | W 93 - 74 |
| Feb 14 | vs |  | South Carolina | W 89 - 75 |
| Feb 18 | vs |  | #19 Arkansas | W 117 - 115 (2 OT) |
| Feb 21 | @ |  | LSU | W 90 - 83 |
| Feb 25 | vs | | Mississippi St | W 100 - 75 |
| Feb 28 | @ | | #20 Tennessee | W 71 - 69 |
| Mar 3 | @ |  | Georgia | L 98 - 88 |
| Mar 7 | vs | | Auburn | W 96 - 84 |
| Mar 13 | (N) | | Mississippi | L 80 - 79 |
| Mar 20 | (N) |  | Hofstra | W 90 - 70 |
| Mar 22 | (N) |  | #16 Texas Tech | W 90 - 65 |
| Mar 27 | (N) |  | #2 Michigan | L 90 - 77 |
Stats
| Overall | ||
|---|---|---|
| Record | 25-10 | |
| vs Conference | 13-6 | |
| vs Top 50 | 11-8 | |
| Adj. Predicted Win % | 0.913 [10] | |
| Adj. Efficiency Δ | 28.5 [11] | |
| Strength of schedule | 4th | |
| Adj. Pace | 72.7 [11] | |
| Avg. Margin | 8.5 [34] | |
| Consistency | 215th | |
| 3-point % | 35.8 [68] | |
| 3-point Ratio | 54.1 [1] | |
| Free Throw % | 76.7 [38] | |
| Offense | Defense | |
| Adjusted Efficiency | 129.4 [5] | 100.9 [56] |
| Adjusted Four Factors - Offense | ||
| Value | Correlation | |
| Effective FG% | 58.8 [12] | 0.64 [359] |
| Offensive Turnover % | 12.9 [17] | -0.17 [313] |
| Offensive Rebound % | 34.1 [65] | 0.7 [2] |
| Free Throw Rate | 34.8 [186] | 0.09 [260] |
| Adjusted Four Factors - Defense | ||
| Value | Correlation | |
| Opponent Effective FG% | 46.3 [19] | 0.75 [299] |
| Defensive Turnover % | 14.1 [322] | -0.47 [127] |
| Defensive Rebound % | 71.1 [137] | -0.55 [29] |
| Opponent Free Throw Rate | 28.6 [42] | 0.21 [141] |
Note: Kalman filter settling time is responsible for some of the early season variance.