 | #265 Central Michigan |
| Mount Pleasant, MI - Mid-American |
2025-2026 Schedule
Note: Game results highlighted in green indicate that the team exceeded expectations, even if it was a loss. Games highlighted in red indicate that the team failed to meet expectations, even if it was a win.
| Date | Opponent | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs |  | App St | W 82 - 66 |
| Nov 8 | @ |  | Bradley | L 85 - 54 |
| Nov 13 | (N) |  | South Alabama | L 66 - 64 |
| Nov 14 | (N) |  | Coppin St | W 82 - 59 |
| Nov 20 | vs |  | Northern Kentucky | L 90 - 66 |
| Nov 22 | @ |  | Marquette | L 85 - 71 |
| Dec 2 | @ |  | Loyola Chicago | L 83 - 72 |
| Dec 7 | @ |  | Saint Louis | L 107 - 65 |
| Dec 13 | @ |  | Stony Brook | L 78 - 55 |
| Dec 20 | @ |  | Northern Illinois | L 74 - 73 |
| Dec 22 | @ |  | #25 Wisconsin | L 88 - 61 |
| Dec 30 | vs |  | Ohio | L 80 - 64 |
| Jan 3 | vs |  | Toledo | L 78 - 75 |
| Jan 6 | @ |  | Akron | L 82 - 69 |
| Jan 10 | vs |  | Kent St | W 87 - 85 |
| Jan 13 | @ |  | Miami (OH) | L 100 - 61 |
| Jan 20 | vs |  | Ball St | L 68 - 67 |
| Jan 24 | @ |  | Western Michigan | L 77 - 65 |
| Jan 27 | vs |  | Eastern Michigan | W 100 - 65 |
| Jan 31 | vs |  | Bowling Green | W 62 - 59 |
| Feb 3 | @ |  | Massachusetts | L 95 - 89 |
| Feb 7 | @ |  | Louisiana | L 85 - 80 |
| Feb 14 | vs | | Northern Illinois | W 88 - 46 |
| Feb 17 | @ | | Eastern Michigan | L 66 - 54 |
| Feb 21 | vs | | Western Michigan | W 83 - 70 |
| Feb 24 | @ | | Kent St | L 83 - 81 |
| Feb 28 | @ |  | Buffalo | W 75 - 70 |
| Mar 3 | vs | | Akron | L 77 - 64 |
| Mar 6 | @ | | Ball St | L 85 - 69 |
Stats
| Overall | ||
|---|---|---|
| Record | 8-21 | |
| vs Conference | 6-12 | |
| vs Top 50 | 0-2 | |
| Adj. Predicted Win % | 0.338 [265] | |
| Adj. Efficiency Δ | -11.4 [296] | |
| Strength of schedule | 195th | |
| Adj. Pace | 68.4 [157] | |
| Avg. Margin | -6 [295] | |
| Consistency | 356th | |
| 3-point % | 33.9 [181] | |
| 3-point Ratio | 34.1 [291] | |
| Free Throw % | 69.7 [279] | |
| Offense | Defense | |
| Adjusted Efficiency | 103.1 [269] | 114.5 [302] |
| Adjusted Four Factors - Offense | ||
| Value | Correlation | |
| Effective FG% | 52 [158] | 0.88 [38] |
| Offensive Turnover % | 18.2 [301] | -0.18 [311] |
| Offensive Rebound % | 28.6 [225] | 0.44 [79] |
| Free Throw Rate | 31.3 [276] | 0.13 [230] |
| Adjusted Four Factors - Defense | ||
| Value | Correlation | |
| Opponent Effective FG% | 54.6 [305] | 0.87 [69] |
| Defensive Turnover % | 17.1 [122] | -0.42 [178] |
| Defensive Rebound % | 65 [339] | -0.36 [137] |
| Opponent Free Throw Rate | 39.4 [288] | 0.05 [297] |
Note: Kalman filter settling time is responsible for some of the early season variance.